If you make fat jokes about Adele, you’re being a dick, and I’m referring to you, Joan Rivers. Seth Macfarlane started it at the Oscars, but then after the Oscars, Joan Rivers tweeted, quote, ‘You could easily pick Adele’s statuette out of a line up because it was the only one wearing Spanx.’ Then, she went on The Letterman Show and made a whole bunch of awful jokes, and included her saying, ‘I’ve met Adele’, and then she went, [puffs face/body out].
FUCK YOU.
How dare you make fun of one of the best female role models on the planet for the way she looks. Adele is one of the very few women in pop music that I want my daughter to look up to, and you’re making jokes about the way she looks, when you’re so insecure about your own face you’ve spent more money on it than the producers of Life of Pi spent on that tiger!
I’ve met Adele and she was lovely - and hot. You, Joan Rivers, have become a jaded, bitter old mole. Get a plastic surgeon to manufacture yourself a new soul. Stop being an enormous, hypocritical, insensitive DICK.
"Adam Hills, showing off just how amazing he is. (via colestclair)
wow, a white man criticizing a woman for body-shaming another woman… by body-shaming her? because if anything will solve the problem of women judging each other’s appearances, it’s clearly MEN judging women’s appearances.
wow congrats adam hills
good for u
u have solved the problem
a+

(Source: specialmandate)
look at the medusa straight on.: on “loving your body.” (via vladislava)
just think about how easily they turn this rhetoric against trans people. while radical self acceptance can be part of transition, the anti-trans people demand radical self acceptance body acceptance instead of transition. And then, if radical body acceptance involves certain intersex conditions, they denounce it too.
(via ananiujitha)
interesting different perspective on body positivity
dan savage is the person who founded the It Gets Better campaign, and is also reknowned for his “Savage Love” advice column that deals with sex, sexuality, love, and whatever other freaky stuff readers write in about
and he’s like, totally all about GSM rights, y’all!
as long as you’re a white cis homosexual male, anyway.
oh, and don’t be fat. being fat is sooooooo gross.
there’s this lovely incident where he tells a reader who indentifies as “minimally sexual” (somewhere between the spectrum of asexual and heterosexual) and all minimally sexual and asexual everywhere to stop “inflicting themselves” upon “normally sexual” people.
With all the minimally sexuals out there making normally sexuals miserable, NSNA, it should be obvious to all regular readers that there’s not exactly a shortage of people who aren’t interested in sex. With that being the case, why would you even contemplate inflicting yourself on a normally sexual person? Why not go find another minimally sexual person? You’ll be doing your minimally sexual self a favor, you’ll be doing your future minimally sexual partner a favor, and you’ll be doing all normally sexual persons everywhere a favor by removing two minimals—you and your future partner—from the dating pool.
what a fucking asshole
in the same column, talking to a woman who recently came out as queer, he refers to her tactic of telling a bisexual friend she doesn’t want to pursue a relationship because she’s still unstable from the coming-out process as “a baby-dyke variation on “I’m just not ready for a relationship right now.”“
“baby-dyke” lmao okay asshole
we also have this awesome incident where a woman writes in about how her once-gay-ex-husband-now-transexual-ex-wife has gone through a series of events in her life - first, coming out as gay, and then being diagnosed with HIV, and now declaring that she is undergoing hormone treatment and preparing for surgery to become a woman. this is having a negative impact on their 15yo son, and the mother writes in, concerned.
savage’s response? he repeatedly refers to her ex as a tranny and as a man, and just shows very little regard for the whole situation in general.
Divorced parents, gay dad, the HIV bombshell… and now, so suddenly, a woman. That’s an awful lot for a high-school-age kid, especially a boy, to deal with. The tranny activists are going to jump down my throat for this, but… it seems to me that your ex could’ve put off the sex change until after his son was out of high school. One of the things parents are supposed to do is make sacrifices, big and small, for the sake of their children. And while I think people have a right to do pretty much as they please (and parents are people), I also believe that children have a right to some stability and constancy from the adults in their lives. Perhaps I’m a transphobic bigot, but I honestly think waiting a measly 36 months to cut your dick is a sacrifice any father should be willing to make for his 15-year-old son. Call me old-fashioned.
Unfortunately, your ex wasn’t willing to make that sacrifice (selfish tranny!), or it never occurred to him to make that sacrifice (stupid tranny!).
what a fucking piece of work
(same article, he also states that sexually dominant women are rare… okay :/ he must have poor google skills)
he basically says no one should date bisexual people because they’re all sleazy heartbreakers:
I’m not saying bi guys are bad people, or they don’t make great one-night stands. Bushes, bathhouses, and sleazy gay bars are crawling with bi guys. But if a guy wants more, he’ll have an easier time getting it from another gay man.
[…]
Judging from my mail, Andrew, when a gay guy or a straight girl gets involved with a bi guy, someone always winds up getting hurt. And guess what? It’s rarely the bi guy. So while I wish the rules and the risks were the same for everyone, it seems that in this instance they’re not.
[…]
No, there are definitely some people who should fool around with bisexual men: OTHER BISEXUAL MEN! Jesus Christ, bisexuals — if straights and gays treat you unfairly, then why not turn to each other for love and comfort? Judging from my mail of late, there’s an unlimited supply of easily offended, extremely verbose, highly ethical bisexuals out there looking for love. Fuck each other!
REMEMBER KIDS, ONLY EVER PURSUE A RELATIONSHIP WITH YOUR OWN KIND! DON’T CROSS THE STREAMS! DON’T DIRTY THE BLOODLINES!
one of his crowning moments of sheer asshatery, where a rape survivor writes in with concerns about a previous article.
he starts off okay:
I’m extremely sorry that you were raped, DRARS,
but then it just gets
so much worse
so quickly
although your baseless accusations of rape make me doubt your claim to be a survivor of rape. The feminist bloggers are going to accuse me of thought crimes: If a woman says she was raped then, by God, she was raped. (Tell it to the lacrosse team.) If this is a thought crime, well, I plead entrapment: I wouldn’t have had these illegal thoughts if you hadn’t sent me such a stupid letter in the first place.
so basically “sorry you got raped but lol i don’t believe you really did and now i’m going to mock you”
the letter she was expressing concern about was a man who has a sexual fetish for fucking a woman while she’s asleep. his wife consented while awake, but in her sleep, she “whimpers, turns away, and otherwise makes herself inaccessible”. if that isn’t her body clearly unconsciously expressing that it does not comfortable with those sexual advances, i don’t know what is.
savage gave the man the advice to drug his wife so she would be more prone while sleeping. he then states, “I’d be willing to pop a sleeping pill now and then to keep my boyfriend happy, so why not Ambien?”
because how he thinks and feels and would act is the blueprint of how everyone should, clearly!
he finishes it off beautifully.
I hereby withdraw my consent for you to read Savage Love. If you continue to read my column against my will, well, we all know what word to apply to your actions.
who let this man near an equality movement?
he continues to show stunning disregard for asexuality when he apparently disparages the sexuality on a podcast (that i refuse to listen to - his grating, pompous voice dripping with crass superiority gives me a headache), and receives this letter from an asexual woman who only discovered that asexuality even existed several months into a relationship, explaining her asexuality, and was completely open with her boyfriend about it. she was fully expecting to get dumped, but her boyfriend was very understanding and they’d been together three years as of the sending of the email.
in savage’s response, he says the only possible way any man could ever love her and want to pursue a relationship with her is if they were “either a fool or a fag”.
i
um
ok?????????????????????//
and as the piece de resistance, an anon super helpfully reminded me of the FUCKNODANSAVAGE tumblr
for your browsing convenience
^ This is like a greatest hits summary of why we exist!
I FUCKING HATE DAN SAVAGE.
excellent
(Source: bullshitcockroach)
Why the “Fat Is Unhealthy” Argument is so insulting
submitted by absolutelyarsenic:
We’ve all heard it before.
“Being overweight or obese isn’t healthy.”
“This is a medical issue.”
“I’m just concerned for your health.”
For the most part, if a serious medical issue is being discussed, people offer half-hearted advice, which is good, considering most of them aren’t doctors. But once weight comes into play, suddenly everybody is an expert on everyone else’s body, and they won’t hesitate to tell you that if you are overweight/obese, you are undeniably unhealthy and you are going to die young and ill. And if you try to counter it, or tell them that such a statement is out of line, you are often met with something along the lines of, “I’m just concerned about you.”
That’s where the problem begins.
Fat-shamers tend to present this argument as though the fat person in question needs this advice, that this is something that they’ve never heard before. If someone doesn’t tell them that they’re unhealthy, they’ll never know, right?
I don’t think it’s an understatement to say that, as a whole, overweight people know the health risks that come with their weight [1]. We’ve all heard the argument a thousand times, whether it’s directed at us or not. By telling me that my weight is unhealthy, you are implying that I need to hear this from you, that what you’re saying will bring my health issues to my attention and prompt me to fix them.
My health issues are already at my attention. Fat people, for the most part, know they’re fat. If a person has a health condition and you don’t, chances are they’re more informed about the condition than you are. If they’re not trying to lose weight, then either they accept their weight and the health risks that come with it, or it is not possible for them to lose the weight to make them “healthy”.
Many overweight and obese people simply CAN NOT lose weight, often for medical reasons. I, for example, am on multiple antidepressants that give me low heat tolerance, low blood pressure and low blood sugar. Those side effects make it dangerous to overexert myself. If I work out, I pass out. I’ve gained weight since I started the medication, but I’d rather be fat than be stuck in the living hell that is severe mental illness. I may die from heart disease eventually, but seeing as the alternative is being suicidal, I’ll gladly accept the weight.
Or perhaps the person in question is like my mother. She is overweight. Not only does she have Crohn’s disease, she is severely allergic to all gluten, nuts, fruit, and soy. This limits her diet greatly. The healthy recipes we see in the magazines would kill her. She also has brittle bones from her Crohn’s medication, so exercise is out of the question.
But I digress. The points I’m trying to make are that
One, the “fat is unhealthy” argument is an insult to the intelligence of fat people.
Two, many people can not get “healthy”, or their weight is simply the lesser of two health issues.
And three, it’s none of anybody’s goddamn business why we weigh as much as we do.
If someone asked an underweight person why they were thin, and the person had anorexia or was severely ill, the person asking the question would feel a bit embarrassed, maybe even ashamed. But if a fat person’s weight is connected to a medical issue, it’s apparently still okay to make rude remarks to them about their weight.
It is never okay to assume things about a person’s health based solely on their weight. And I think everybody needs to accept that.
——
[1] I would just like to ammend this statement a little bit - “overweight people know the perceived health risks that come with their weight” - In my time studying Health at Every Size, I have learned that correlation does not imply causation. “Just because a disease is correlated with obesity does not mean that it is caused by obesity.” (x) Just wanted to clarify. This is a brilliant submission, I think it says a lot of things about fat health that are often unsaid or not understood. Thank you so much. - Haley
The answer is NO.
The “fact” that junk food is cheaper than real food has become a reflexive part of how we explain why so many Americans are overweight, particularly those with lower incomes. I frequently read confident statements like, “when a bag of chips is cheaper than a head of broccoli …” or “it’s more affordable to feed a family of four at McDonald’s than to cook a healthy meal for them at home.”
(via sunfoundation)
this bullshit fills me with a very specific kind of rage. so, TIME TO DEBUNK!
- that meal from mcdonalds takes virtually no time to acquire AND is available almost anywhere.
- the second meal? that “salad” is lettuce … with nothing else, not even dressing unless its just olive oil or some milk i guess? gross.
- also thats the price of each serving, not an entire loaf of bread, a bottle of olive oil, etc. that stuff adds up which means you have to have a lot of money at one time to buy it all.
- that meal probably took an hour and a half to make, which is a long fucking time when you work multiple jobs or are caring for a lot of people or dont have help! seriously, if you are a single parent of three who works, is spending an hour and a half every night preparing a meal a likely option?
- same with beans and rice! also, you know whats a fucking bummer? eating beans and rice every night because you are poor. ask any person who has done it and they will tell you (you can start with me).
- there is a “nutrition” argument here that lacks a follow up: poor people are more likely to be doing physical labor and need more than 571 calories per meal.
- you know who is less likely to know how to bake or prepare a chicken? people without access to the internet, or libraries, or who werent taught how to by their parents because their parents worked all the time. access to healthy foods is a classist issue and classism is cyclical, you fucking morons.
- seriously, these sorts of infographics make me want to fucking flip tables. do you know why people don’t eat more fresh fruits and vegetables? because fresh fruits and vegetables are expensive, because they take a long time to prepare, because they dont live near a grocery store that has a decent produce section, because they dont have reliable transportation to get groceries to and from the grocery store, because they dont have the energy to plan all of the shit that is involved in making healthy, intentional, filling, balanced meals. basically: poor people get fucked, and then we get BLAMED for being lazy.
- eating “healthy”, aka access to fresh fruits and vegetables, is a privilege, first, foremost, always. so fuck you new york times and your ignorant goddamn infographic.
- there are SYSTEMATIC REASONS that we do not have equal access to fresh fruits and vegetables. they are very REAL problems. besides, you know, systematic poverty in america, the total mis-distribution of farm subsidies is a perfect place to start. read about that, then either get bent or start working on the actual problem.
YES YES YES YES YES
I am so fucking tired of seeing these misleading as fuck infographics about how “healthy eating is cheap!” No. No it is fucking not.
AND where the FUCK are you getting your food that salt and pepper are 5 cents?!??! or bacon for $1.85? or a CUP of oil for 55 cents? FOUR pieces of bread for 75 cents? 3 cups for rice for 50 cents?
this stuff just doesn’t make sense, is extremely shaming, and is extremely misleading.
Making homemade food affordable and healthy is very important to me, but let’s just point out a few things.
1. If you have very little money, you will *not* be eating Big Macs. You will be ordering off of the dollar menu. Off the dollar menu, that $28 is going to buy me two cheeseburgers, a fries, and a Coke for a family of SEVEN.OK, six, really, because tax, and the double cheeseburgers are actually $1.19 now, but still. The point remains that I just bought 12 double cheeseburgers, 6 small fries, and 6ea. 16 oz. “small” sodas for about $26 plus tax. Trust me, I’ve actually done this…many times. Hell yes, I’ve dug under the seats of my car for that last nickel to get a $1 double cheeseburger when I had nothing else. Oh, wait, we were serving only four people? OK, so now we’re down to only $18 plus tax. Plus, I get free salt, pepper, ketchup, mustard, barbecue sauce, straws, napkins.
Now remember, each person in the family got TWO double cheeseburgers (that’s four small meat patties, four slices of cheese, and four slices of “bread” (sic), with onions, pickles, ketchup, and mustard, a side of french fries (or *two* apple pies), and two cups (16 oz.) of Coke, because I asked for no ice. No one is going hungry here, and as things go, there are a whole lot of much more unhealthy things they *could* have eaten, instead.
2. And I don’t have to clean up. No soap, no hot water, no dishwasher, no sponges, no dishes, no nothing involved that would be necessary to serve the equivalent at home. You forgot to add the prices of all those things. All the remains get binned.
3. Which means I didn’t have to pay for gas or electricity for my stove to cook this stuff, I didn’t have to pay for power to run the refrigerator, I didn’t have to go shopping for it, I didn’t have to cook it…the list goes on. I think you’re getting the point. And you forgot to add all the prices of those things into the cost of your homemade meal.4. Do you actually know how much a chicken costs? Let’s say $1.69/lb, which is pretty average in my area for a factory-farmed chicken. Now, the chickens you find out there rarely exceed about 7 lbs, which will be called a “roaster”. Anything you see above that is kind of freakish and is probably going to taste like it grew in a vat, not in a battery cage, but you get my drift. In any case, that’s the size chicken I’m going to need to feed a family of six, and that 7 lb bird is going to cost me…$11.83, not $5.96, as the illustration shows. OK, so the chicken you picked is for four people, so I guess I can get a 4.5 lb bird, instead, for $7.60. Wait, that’s still more money than $5.96. Oh, and can we spice it up with something besides salt and pepper, and *maybe* a squeeze of lemon? That’s pretty boring. For Goddess’ sake, pick up a box of Bell’s Poultry Seasoning, and a head of garlic!
5. That salad? Does it contain anything other than lettuce? I guess I have to make a vinaigrette out of oil, lemon, salt, and pepper, too? Good thing for you, I know how to cook. It’s still going to be a pretty boring salad…but whatevs, I’ll let you slide on that one.
6. One quart of milk? That’s half the volume of drinks I got at Micky D’s, hon. Better make it two quarts. Wait, scratch that, I’m Asian, and my family is lactose intolerant. Try again.
OK, I think you’re starting to get the picture. There’s more to food security, cooking, health, nutrition, food access, and money than meets the eye. I forgive you. After all, I’ve got actual experience at doing all of these things, so I have a visceral understanding of all the processes involved. Maybe now you have a little bit more insight into it, as well.
Umm Gemma can we please just elect you Queen of the World because this is literally everything I wanted to say but didn’t and yes, sweet jesus, yes.
Thank you from all of us who have been there and regularly find sugar packets in their pockets to attest to it.
yeah wow fuck this little infograph thing.
Reblogged for the amazing added commentary.
Love seeing these stupid posters debunked. And, uh, at what grocery store can I buy four pieces of sandwich bread or a half cup of olive oil?
Lately I’ve been trying to cook and eat at home more often. It is more economical in the long run (compared to going out to eat in general, not just getting McDonald’s) and probably better for me than the glue-like Lean Cuisines I’ve been subsisting on at work. BUT. It is a luxury to have a full kitchen and almost every pot, pan and appliance under the sun (which were wedding gifts - another luxury). It is a luxury to have enough money to buy a whole chicken (last one I bought was 4 lbs and cost $7) and loaves of whole-wheat bread ($3.89 at Target) and fresh ingredients. It is a luxury that I work normal hours and don’t have kids or other pressing responsibilities to take care of when I get home, so I can spend a couple hours cooking in the evening when the mood strikes me.
Instead of making food-shaming posters, maybe we should focus on making these luxuries more accessible to impoverished American families. Just maybe.
maaaaaaaaaaan i can’t stand all this obesity epidemic poor people are stupid and lazy jamie oliver white savior style bullshit, jfc. it’s all by people who have no fucking idea about the realities of being poor. fuck all y’all if you try to come at us with this shit.
i love to see the debunking and disproving. it gives me liiiiife.
but i need to add, if it’s okay
that if i choose to spend my last $5 on a 20pc nuggets
that’s my muhfuckin business.
just sayin.
the debunks are so wonderful. fuck all the bullshit. and yea, repetitively eating rice and beans is something you don’t really wanna reminisce on. the grocery store i go to out here is the cheapest store i’ve ever shopped at and none of those things are the prices above. really? and the mcdonalds breakdown, so real. please let’s not act like all the people preparing foods are able bodied, neurotypical, etc. cause in a household where two depressed people live, getting the energy up to do both dishes and cook and all that, is just… not easy. with no kids. fuck outta here.
The Top 6 Reasons Why You Should Hate Dan Savage
TW for pretty much everything
1. Dan Savage hates trans people and uses transphobic slurs.
“Children have a right to some stability and constancy from the adults in their lives. Perhaps I’m a transphobic bigot, but I honestly think waiting a measly 36 months to cut your dick is a sacrifice any father should be willing to make for his 15-year-old son. Call me old-fashioned.
Unfortunately, your ex wasn’t willing to make that sacrifice (selfish tranny!), or it never occurred to him to make that sacrifice (stupid tranny!)…. If your son can’t deal with having his dad/mom/whatever around right now, support him and tell his dad/mom/whatever to leave the two of you alone for the time being.”
2. Dan Savage believes that bisexuals do not and should not exist.
“I’m not saying bi guys are bad people, or they don’t make great one-night stands. Bushes, bathhouses, and sleazy gay bars are crawling with bi guys. But if a guy wants more, he’ll have an easier time getting it from another gay man.”
3. Dan Savage has admonished women for not putting up with their partner’s sexual desires and has criticized female rape survivors’ stories.
“There the guy was, boned for you, and he was brave enough to put his desires out there, to make himself vulnerable (which is what the ladies are always saying they want, right?), and you lobbed the ol’ “What?!?” bomb at him and made him feel like a freak. Is it any wonder that he quickly moved on to “other things” and, one would hope, better sex partners?”
“I’m extremely sorry that you were raped, DRARS, although your baseless accusations of rape make me doubt you when you claim to be a survivor of rape. The feminist bloggers are going to accuse me of thought crimes: If a woman says she was raped then, by God, she was raped. (Tell it to the lacrosse team.) But if my reaction to your letter is a thought crime, I can only plead entrapment: I wouldn’t have had these illegal thoughts if you hadn’t sent me such a stupid letter in the first place… Finally, DRARS, I hereby withdraw my consent for you to read Savage Love. If you continue to read my column against my will, well, we all know what word to apply to your actions.”
4. Dan Savage thinks that racist gay white men are less of a threat to African-Americans than homophobic African-Americans are to gay people.
“I do know this, though: I’m done pretending that the handful of racist gay white men out there—and they’re out there, and I think they’re scum—are a bigger problem for African Americans, gay and straight, than the huge numbers of homophobic African Americans are for gay Americans, whatever their color.”
EDIT: Here are some more lovely gems from our resident asshole Dan Savage on his rampant hatred for everything not white, male, and gay:
5. Dan Savage thinks asexuals are secretly “fags”.
“I appreciate the feedback, Stephanie, and I’m sorry I offended you. But… um… I couldn’t help but think, as I read your letter, that your boyfriend is either a fool or a fag. But if it works for you guys—if a romantic relationship devoid of sexual attraction and activity works for you guys—then it works for you guys. Who am I to argue with success?”
6. Dan Savage is fatphobic.
“First off, LARDASS, you neglected to include a sign-off, forcing me to create one for you. I tried to create one that captured the spirit and tone of your letter, and I think I did pretty well… I am thoroughly annoyed at having my tame statements of fact—being heavy is a health risk; rolls of exposed flesh are unsightly—characterized as ‘hate speech.’”